|
Book Review

"Benedict's
Dharma: Buddhists Reflect on the Rule of Saint Benedict'
by Norman Fisher, Joseph Goldstein, Judith Simmer-Brown,Yofa(Editor),
Patrick Henery(Editor).
By
Christina Fox
Reprinted courtesy
of Golden String Publication
This book is
the child of the Gethsemani Encounter, a seminal and extended dialogue
between Buddhist and Christian monastics which, at the request of
the Dalai Lama, was held in 1996 at the monastery of his friend
Thomas Merton. The purpose of the meetings was to explore the monastic
archetype which in their distinctive ways each tradition exemplifies.
As Patrick Henry listened to two of the Christian monastics, it
occurred to him that, if a few of the technical terms were changed,
it might just as well have been a discussion between two Buddhists.
From that flash of insight this book emerged, in which Buddhist
monastics from several traditions and states of life respond to
the distinctive character of that very explicitly Christian document,
the Rule of St Benedict.
Like almost
all such encounters in our time, Benedict's Dharma walks the tightrope
between cultures, doctrines and experiences; between patterns of
difference and of similarity. In dialogue between Buddhists and
Christians, one sometimes senses an undercurrent of anxiety. We
are frequently exhorted not to attempt to put a yak's head on a
sheep. All this is quite understandable. No one wants to see either
tradition treated as another commodity, to be packaged attractively
with an eye to the Western market. We ought not to sell the Gospel,
the Dharma or the Benedictine Rule, through superficial syncretism
or any other means. One of the strengths of Benedict's Dharma is
that it moves beyond this anxiety, to face with trust the cost and
promise of deep ecumenism; a gift which will inevitably change both
traditions, not by sacrificing their distinctive gifts and insights,
but by an undefended and receptive listening, a mutual lection in
which each tradition becomes for the other a living and holy text.
As we breathe each other's spiritual atmospheres in this way, we
will be changed, in ways that we cannot wholly predict.
Perhaps as Christians
we might see this as a participation in the death and resurrection
of Christ. After all, we have been there before, as primitive Christianity
absorbed and was transformed by Greek philosophy. We are placing
ourselves in a crucible, as the Buddha himself taught: testing,
rubbing, refining, purifying, not only the teachings and traditions
of the other, but also our own. From the crucible comes pure gold.
As Steindl-Rast reminds us in his invaluable concluding essay, Benedict's
Rule is written in letters of fire. In reading it, much less attempting
to live by it, we are on holy ground. In a website devoted to discussion
of this book, Steindl-Rast reminds us that baptism was once known
as photismos, - illumination, enlightenment. Baptism begins the
opening of our eyes to the deifying light of which Benedict speaks.
Catching even a glimpse of this light, thousands of people, including
that glittering prize, 'youth', are turning from a materially glutted
and spiritually famished culture, and flocking to Buddhist centres
and Buddhist masters. A startling number of them were brought up
as Christians. Many of them are attracted to Buddhist paths because
they need to find enlightenment embodied, not only in a text or
a tradition, but also in living teachers, in whom they see an extension
or manifestation of the Buddha himself. They display a longing for
authentic teachers and teaching. When they sense this authenticity,
they willingly entrust themselves to the demanding disciplines of
the ancient paths, and to teachers who make little allowance for
the sensibilities of post-modern Western egos. The youthful David
Steindl-Rast's response to the Rule illustrates this: he felt that
what we in practice had now, fourteen hundred years after Benedict,
was not Benedict's Rule; and it was Benedict's Rule that inspired
him. It was like reading a score that had never been performed.
He is not alone in this response; yet aspirants to Benedictine monasteries
are seldom encouraged to retain it.
However obscurely
or confusedly, such aspirants, Buddhist or Christian, seem to know
instinctively that what we long for is in us, whether this is understood
as Buddha-nature or as the interior presence of the divine energies,
commonly known as the image of God. Without ever having heard of
Origen, they sense the truth of his words: Understand that you are
another universe ... that in you there are sun, moon, and stars
too ... Sensing this, they want to do what the Magi did. As children
of their culture, they want to follow the stars, those whom they
take to be the manifestation in outward form of their inner teacher,
the star within. Benedict's Dharma sheds light on two paths which
flow with this inclination and energy, instead of eyeing it from
afar with apprehension and disapproval.
Just about everything
in our Western Christian experience clouds our vision here. Unlike
the Buddhists, some denominations have a three-fold order of ministry,
an institutionally transmitted lineage, through which the ordained
are held to be drawn into the Apostolic Succession in virtue of
their ordination, ex opere operato. The validity of the Sacrament
of Holy Order (as of all Sacraments) is considered to depend upon
neither the personal holiness and wisdom of the ordaining bishop,
nor that of the ordinand. For a Buddhist, to be ordained means simply,
to be a monk or nun. Benedict writes of the abbot as the one who
holds the place of Christ in the community; but except in the case
of founders, this text refers to an elected figure, who is seen
in this way in virtue of his office, whether he is also a charismatic
teacher or not. As with Christian ordination there is no question
here of the direct transmission of wisdom and holiness through a
living charismatic lineage. In the monasteries of the Eastern Orthodox,
however, one may meet living lineage-holders, spiritual fathers
or mothers who do not necessarily hold any institutional office
at all. These charismatic lineages are regarded as themselves a
form of Apostolic Succession, by the direct and living transmission
of grace from heart to heart, across many generations. From time
to time new lineage-founders emerge. Was not Father Bede Griffiths
such a one, as abbot and guru?
Buddhists take
this ongoing supply of stars as a given. Many Christians do not.
The primacy of office over charism in the life of the Western churches
and of text over image in the Protestant mind undergirds the deep
reserve which many contemporary Christians feel towards gurus of
every description. Yet it was surely Benedict's desire that the
abbot be a person in whom the graces of office and charism were
fused. A star is a ball of fire whose light reaches us through almost
unimaginable space-time. Lovely as it is, we know that the source
of the starlight is dead. It was not so for the Fathers themselves;
and the light of these spiritual stars is inextinguishable. Moreover,
as Kallistos Ware reminds us, who are we to say that the age of
the Fathers is over? Who knows but that God will send us another
Basil? Or indeed, although Ware does not say so, another Macrina?
Here, it seems to me, is a nettle which contemporary Christian monastics,
and, indeed, the Western churches themselves, are still struggling
to grasp. Folk wisdom assures us that nettles don't sting as long
as we take hold of them boldly. In the book, the nettle of charismatic
leadership has several companion-plants: obedience, humility and
lay monasticism. Among a number of other significant topics, these
three will be the focus of this review.
As the Zen priest
and abbot Norman Fisher says of the charismatic teacher, in the
beginning, a Buddhist monastery is created around such a figure,
and everyone who has come is there because of the leader's charisma.
In a sense, the monastery's lifeblood and the person of the superior
seem to be one and the same. In a Tibetan Buddhist monastery, a
reincarnate successor is sought; in a community in the West, a local
leader may be appointed as the representative of the lineage-holder.
When the first charismatically graced founder of a Zen monastery
dies, the community must perforce elect a successor or dissolve
itself. At least in Christian monasteries, the choice is seldom
considered so bluntly. A tacit decision to proceed to election is
virtually built into the fabric of modern Christian monastic life.
Where there is no charismatic successor to hand, no obvious Dharma-heir,
Buddhist monastics are quite free to go to another monastery, whereas
it is far harder for Benedictines. Monastic constitutions and the
sheer weight of common practice, together with canon law, make the
transference of one's stability a very serious matter. Both Buddhist
and Christian monastics are walking a path which becomes incandescent
when it is embodied in a living teacher, not just in a text. Clearly,
then, the selection of a successor, like the choice of whom to follow
in the first instance, as founder or root lama, is a mysterious
and religiously monumental task.
Steindl-Rast
points out that the Rule of St Benedict offers a specific and detailed
blueprint for our journey into the deifying light. It is by no means
the only blueprint that can be trusted, but it has worked. The marvellous
intricacies of a great cathedral depend on the ground-plan, and
its practical enactment. An indispensable part of Benedict's ground-plan
is his teaching on obedience to the abbot. Under the Gospel and
the Rule, a wise and discerning abbot provides a thread through
the labyrinth of our own cloudy minds and wills. There is no glorifying
of impulse here. Yet, no matter how often we are reminded that it
means 'listening', many Christians, and some monastics, dislike
the very word 'obedience.' Mutual, horizontal obedience may in practice
be considered more appropriate to adult monastics today than is
the Rule's strongly vertical emphasis on obedience to the abbot.
There may be much talk of personal responsibility, delegation and
initiative. In the daily give-and-take of monastic life, where the
abbot's wishes are at least implicitly known, they may be quietly
resisted surprisingly often, especially in small things. If the
horizontal perspective is too dominant, we may end by obeying the
collective ego, or the one who shouts loudest, with the abbot as
a rubber-stamp. Yet there is more to the minutiae than meets the
eye; they too are part of the enactment of the ground-plan, and
so It is not all right to treat practical injunctions of the Rule
cavalierly .
In the mandala
of community, as Judith Simmer-Brown, a Vajrayana practitioner,
notes, the abbot or guru is at the centre and the others are the
perimeter; centre and perimeter are constantly interacting. Teacher
and student must listen to each other; the guru must decide, and
the others follow. If they don't listen, his wisdom will not benefit
them because they will be unable to receive it, and if he doesn't
listen it will be an unnatural graft that does not take. Attachment
or resistance to his personality is an obstacle to the listening
of the student; a defensive refusal to consult or to be spiritually
visible and vulnerable is an obstacle to the listening of the teacher.
The charisms and disciplines of leading and following, as all the
traditions represented in this book seem to realise, are inter-dependent.
In the book, a lot of energy seems to constellate around these delicate
and profoundly formative visions of leading and following. The Burmese
nun Yifa's polite and pointed reservations about the teaching of
the Rule on obedience, for example, represent a cutting-edge of
dialogue. For Theravadin practitioners sometimes express similar
reservations about the place of guru-devotion in the Vajrayana tradition,
in which the teacher is seen as the embodiment of the enlightened
state; our inner teacher, which is ultimately the awakened mind,
manifest in the external form of the outer teacher - star mirroring
star, as we saw above.
The misunderstanding
of Benedictine obedience which, in my view, she expresses, is alive
and well in wider Christian circles too. A naive or simplistic conflation
between institutional authority and the authority of God is a fertile
breeding-ground for abuse of authority, and an ongoing temptation
for all Christian institutions. Moreover, I suggest, we have been
radically impoverished by our excessive focus on the authority of
office to the exclusion of charismatic authority. When Adalbert
de Vogue, author of many scholarly and theological commentaries
on the Rule, pointed out some years ago that a Benedictine monastery
was a community gathered around an abbot, there was an outcry. This
neglect and resistance seems to be com-pounded of inculpable ignorance
and fear. Contingent historical circumstances have obscured, and
to some extent ruptured, the continuity of our Patristic and monastic
heritage for us. Predatory 'gurus' abound in the West, and we have
all seen something of the damage they can do.
Most of us,
however, have seen it from afar; most Western Christians have no
experience at all of following a charismatically gifted teacher.
One of the great gifts of this book is its steadfast refusal to
leave the fresh fields of lived experience. There is nothing purely
speculative or theoretical in what the authors say. Few Western
people could be more qualified by experience to speak about the
teacher-student relationship than Judith Simmer-Brown, a thoroughly
modern, intelligent and sane American academic, who was a student
of the controversial Chogyam Trungpa until his death. She writes
peacefully, after years of living what she writes, that the commitment
and devotion to the root teacher require putting aside personal
preferences in following the spiritual counsel of the teacher. This
touches on another very sensitive area for Western Christian monastics.
It goes far beyond just obeying orders, which may be little more
than a joyless and grudging resignation, draining one's energies.
For Simmer-Brown is talking about radical and highly interpersonal
renunciation. This is only possible and life-giving when it springs
from a foundational trust in the teacher of a kind that many Christians
find positively alarming, as we saw. At the same time, it challenges
us to look more closely at our own defences. For the Buddhist, disobedience,
pride, and murmuring are more than momentary gestures of autonomy
or independence. They are all expressions of self-absorption [which
is] a defence against our own spiritual development .
To expose that
self-absorption in a way that neither breaks the rusty vessel nor
crushes the bruised reed is one of the principle tasks of the spiritual
teacher. Speaking of Chogyam Trungpa's various ways of exposing
her stubbornness, Simmer-Brown writes: Even if he said nothing,
my awareness of my confusion and self-absorption became highlighted
in his presence. The shock and nausea of seeing our own self-absorption
can be overwhelming for a time. We may find ourselves awkward or
tongue-tied when we are around our teacher, our neuroses heightened,
as our self-absorption rises to the surface. Simmer-Brown says she
was often unable, in the presence of Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche, to
hold a single coherent thought in her mind. Vulnerability of this
kind opens the heart to the teacher's skilful means. A teacher who
lovingly does this for us, showing us our shortcomings and his view
of them, is a revealer of hidden treasures, inviting us to a true
change of heart.
But what if
the fortress of self-absorption seems impregnable? Then the utmost
delicacy, clarity and firmness are required for the good of all.
One truly incorrigible and self-willed person can destroy a community.
But careful discernment is essential, as rebellion can be a sign
of breakthrough rather than of breakdown; it can mean that one is
approaching fresh frontiers of practice. The disciplines of monastic
life and obedience may be serving to exaggerate [self-absorption
and rebellion] to the point of self-awareness. Either way, the community
needs skilful means to deal with intransigent and disruptive self-absorption,
and to care for the rebel. In the Rule, excommunication is presented
as a final and very drastic circuit-breaker. It is ordered towards
restoration and healing. Actual dismissal is held in reserve for
those whose continued presence would clearly and irremediably be
destructive.
Simmer-Brown's
exploration of this aspect of the teacher-student relationship occurs
in the context of Benedict's teaching on humility. A significant
proportion of this chapter is quite alien to Buddhist sensibilities,
as it is thick with images and ideas derived from the highly stratified
world of the sixth century. For much the same reason, this chapter
is also notoriously difficult for contemporary Westerners to interpret.
If Western monastics are still exploring this issue, little wonder
that Buddhists find it opaque. Yet the Zen Buddhist Norman Fisher
offers one of the most illuminating analyses of it that I have ever
seen.
The Rule likens
our life on earth to Jacob's ladder; our body and soul are its sides,
and the degress of humility are its rungs. Fisher prefers to see
it as a bridge across the chasm that separates the shore of selfishness
and ignorance from the shore of love and true vision. Wise and loving
monastics are always going back and forth across this bridge, until
finally they can't see the difference between the two shores. There
is only the bridge, the bracing, wide-open view of the chasm itself,
and the movement between. A horizontal perspective alongside Benedict's
vertical one, each reflecting its own cultural milieu. Paradoxically,
in the profoundly vertical perspective of the Scriptures and the
Fathers, and indeed of traditional high Christology, one ascends
by descending. The horizontal perspective of Fisher the Zen Buddhist
simply turns the whole image on its side; ladder becomes bridge,
earth and heaven become parallel worlds or shores. Here, perhaps,
it is easier to see that the journey is essentially interior; that
the two shores co-exist in every human heart, as do heaven and earth.
In each case, the polarities dissolve in the depths of humility
and pure perception.
One would at first expect that once this dissolution is accomplished,
the means to it - ladder and bridge - would also disappear, themselves
dissolving into the fusion of horizons towards which they are ordered.
Fisher's interpretation recalls for me Teresa's Interior Castle,
in which the closer one moves to the centre, the larger, not the
smaller, each room is, until one reaches the largest of all, the
limitless spaciousness of the Seventh Mansion. At this point, neither
the acquired nor the infused virtues - the 'bridge/ladder' - disappears;
rather, each becomes a distinctive and scintillating point of radiance,
like the gems of Indra's net. Each part reflects and refracts the
whole. So the ordinary, mundane interior and exterior acts and attitudes
of humility express and direct the limitless energies, the ceaseless
perichoresis of a life transfigured by the deificum lumen, the deifying
light.
That light lives
within and is offered to all, without distinction. In particular,
it is offered as freely to lay people as to vowed monastics.This
leads us naturally to the final issue to be highlighted here. The
monastic heart is alive and well in lay practitioners of both traditions.
As Steindl-Rast notes, lay practitioners are running away with the
monastic ball. The laity deliberately cultivate the contemplative
dimension of life. Oblates outnumber the others by as much as ten
to one; and this figure is growing. In Rumer Godden's In this House
of Brede, a fine novel of life in a great Benedictine monastery
for women caught in the upheaval that followed Vatican 2, an abbess
observes ironically that since contemplatives now want to do the
work of the active orders, and the active orders want to do the
work of the laity, perhaps the laity will turn to contemplation.
And so they have.
This is not
universally recognised. Some monasteries seem to fear that their
own monasticism will be diluted to the point of disappearance, if
the obvious distinctions between lay people and monastics are played
down or even dissolved. Where this fear prevails, oblation tends
to be largely a matter of pious association, with oblates given
no real monastic formation. This book invites monasteries and oblates
to get real about each other. It has been well-said that apples
and oranges don't mix only if you are determined never to enjoy
a fruit salad. Zen monasteries in particular have something to teach
us here. Temporary membership of their monastic communities is seen
as part of one's ongoing life of formation and practice, not as
failure. As the 'householder monastic', Norman Fisher, says in the
website mentioned above, he repeatedly enters and leaves by ritual
gates. So the enclosing walls of the monastery become, in Steindl-Rast's
words, a permeable membrane; a shimmering threshold, not a barrier;
a translucent stream within which monastic and lay practitioners
alike may be at home, like fish in the sea.
The monastery
is a place of intensive practice, the world of the laity, extensive,
expansive and diffused. In the monastery, the bell rings and it's
time to go to the Office, whether you feel like it or not. In many
households, one must, each day, consciously and deliberately renegotiate
a space for the Office. We need each other's complementary charisms.
The imploded world of the monastery offers a highly focussed and
intentional sub-culture in which everything is consciously oriented
to the path. Without regular access to something like this, it is
almost impossible for lay practitioners to keep going. Without regular
contact with those seriously pursuing the monastic ideal in 'the
world', monks and nuns can all too easily become insular, defensive
and condescending.
Oblates ought,
therefore, to be especially welcomed in our Christian monasteries.
And this means more than the exercise of the expected social graces
- the superficial smile or the warm reception of expected guests
- more than a meticulous and thoroughly controlling courtesy by
which monastics and oblates keep each other's distinctive charisms
at a comfortable distance. Preserving the peace and silence of the
monastery need not involve distancing the oblates, keeping them
at bay by rigid enclosure or an obvious and intimidating reticence,
especially if they are members of the opposite sex. Rather, it could
mean asking them to give themselves seriously and humbly to the
disciplines of monastic formation and life; drawing them into lifelong,
non-trivial formation, acknowledging and nurturing the monastic
charism within them, however untutored it may be.
The abbot, obedience
and humility, lay monastics: these are by no means the only issues
explored in Benedict's Dharma; but I have focussed on them in this
review because for contemporary Benedictine monastics they are among
the most thorny. We stand at something of a crossroads. Are the
hundreds of oblates gathering around our monasteries a field ripe
for harvest, or, albeit unwittingly, a swarm of locusts? How do
we listen to the voices of our Buddhist brothers and sisters in
the monastic life? Is this a new Pentecost or a new Tower of Babel?
Will we allow the immense reverence and devotion offered to the
teacher, especially within Vajrayana practice, to cast new light
on what the Rule says about the abbot? Will we allow it to speak
into our experience of choosing and learning from our own abbots
or spiritual teachers? If we do these things, where will it all
lead? Joseph Goldstein, faced with the claim that Dudjom Rinpoche
was a reincarnation of Sariputra, perhaps the closest disciple of
the Buddha, was at first confused. He, a Theravadin who did not
believe in rebirth after enlightenment, had to own that he did not
know whether this claim was true. And this 'not knowing' became
a place of great openness and freedom. 'A breath of fresh air blew
through my mind, sweeping out many previously held opinions, conclusions,
and certainties.'
When you come
to a fork in the road, take it, a master once said. These are brave
words, pointing to a path which is not to be entered lightly; for
it asks much in the way of discipline, detachment, surrender, and
eyes that are brimful with Benedict's deifying light, so beloved
of Steindl-Rast, and so often concealed by the circumlocutions of
nervous translators. The editor and participants in this venture
are among those who have entrusted themselves to the fork in the
road, not quite knowing where it will take them or us. They are
unfailingly courteous and sensitive, yet always, so it seems, honest,
as they gaze with eyes not ours on the very foundations of the Western
monastic life as mirrored in the Rule of St Benedict. Benedict's
Dharma is a complex book, never settling for superficial agreement,
unusually willing to speak openly and strongly about points of union
and mutual illumination. The boundaries between the Buddhist and
Christian monastic traditions are still there; but this exploratory
book weaves across them many subtle, delicate threads of experience
and reflection.
And the end
of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.
The little Rule
for beginners lends itself well to such exploration. The Buddhist
commentators approach it with a mixture of awe and reverence. They
recognize it as belonging to monastics of all traditions. The large-hearted
Benedict would surely agree.
|